GBS Disputes

• Chinese telecoms giant Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Claimant in an ICSID arbitration initiated against the Kingdom of Sweden under the China-Sweden bilateral investment treaty (ICSID Case No. ARB/22/2). The dispute relates to a number of measures taken by Sweden directly targeting Huawei’s investments in Sweden and excluding our client from the roll-out of 5G network products and services in the country.
• Pharmaceutical group Sanofi in an ICC arbitration in Geneva initiated by Boehringer Ingelheim that arose out of an acquisition and concerned liability relating to third party claims. Swiss law applied. The Tribunal fully dismissed the claims against Sanofi seeking indemnification for potential losses in connection with ongoing mass tort litigation in the United States.
• Sonangol E.P., Respondent in three parallel NAI arbitrations in Amsterdam against Exem Energy B.V., a holding company beneficially owned by Isabel dos Santos. The dispute related to high-profile matters of embezzlement, corruption and money-laundering in relation to a joint venture agreement. Dutch and Angolan law applied.  Sonangol enjoyed complete victory in all three cases, including findings in the main NAI arbitration that the relevant transaction could only be explained as an example of “grand corruption”. As a result, the relevant transaction has been declared null and void and Sonangol has been restored to its 100% shareholder position.
• Five gas importers, Respondents in SCC and UNCITRAL arbitrations in Stockholm initiated by an upstream supplier. The disputes arose from a gas price revision clause in long-term supply contracts. Swedish law applied.
• A European life sciences company, Respondent in an arbitration brought by a European chemical company seeking indemnification under a Share Purchase Agreement. The law of the Claimant’s State applied.
• A French-German contractor consortium in an ICC arbitration in Stockholm against a Finnish utility company. The dispute arose from an agreement for the construction of a nuclear power plant in Finland. Finnish law governed. Over EUR 6.1 billion was at stake.
• A Swedish consortium in an ICC arbitration in Miami against a U.S. utility company. The dispute arose from an agreement for the construction of a tunnel in Panama. Swedish law applied.
• Numerous post-award proceedings to enforce or seek the setting aside of awards rendered in commercial arbitrations.

Education

• Columbia University School of Law, LL.M. (Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar) (cum laude)
• Lund University, Juris kandidatexamen, LL.M (summa cum laude)
  Master thesis: “New share issue as means of payment- a study of take-overs through non-cash issue”

Admissions & Courts

• Sweden
• Germany (as EU qualified lawyer)

Languages

• Swedish
• English
• German

Nationality

• Swedish

• Member, Chamber of Lawyers Frankfurt am Main
• Member, Swedish Chamber of Commerce, Germany
• Member, Young Arbitrators Sweden (YAS), Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce
• Member, German Institution of Arbitration (DIS), Frankfurt am Main
• Member, LCIA European Users’ Council

• “Arbitrator Challenges and Parallel Appointments – Striking the Balance between Efficiency and Impartiality,” German Arbitration Journal (SchiedsVZ), 1/2022
• “The Revised Swedish Arbitration Act,” German Arbitration Journal (SchiedsVZ), 3/2019
• “Inconsistent Awards in Investment Arbitration: Is an Appeal Court needed?,” 30(5) Journal of International Arbitration 579 (2013) (co-author)